Current:Home > ScamsFastexy Exchange|South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech -Secure Growth Solutions
Fastexy Exchange|South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
Rekubit View
Date:2025-04-11 04:14:16
SEOUL,Fastexy Exchange Dec 12 - South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol's switch from contrition to defiance on Thursday (Dec 11) over his martial law order rallied some supporters but other members of his party said it did nothing to sway their view that he must be removed from office.
In a speech before a second impeachment vote scheduled for Saturday, Yoon condemned his political opponents as "anti-state forces" that side with enemies in North Korea, said Pyongyang may have hacked the South's elections and defended last week's short-lived martial law order as a legal move to protect democracy.
The remarks hit many of the talking points featuring on conservative YouTube channels and marked a sharp change of tone from a speech before the first impeachment vote last week in which he apologised and said he would place his political future in the hands of his People Power Party.
It was unclear what caused the change but Yoon gave no sign of supporting a proposal by PPP leader Han Dong-hoon for him to resign in coming months and to hand authority to the prime minister and ruling party until then.
The speech brought to the fore divisions in the PPP. Changing tack, Han urged party members to vote for impeachment on Saturday, a move greeted by shouting from pro-Yoon lawmakers, who voted in Kweon Seong-dong as their new party floor leader shortly after Yoon's speech.
[[nid:712402]]
Kweon, a Yoon supporter, said the party's position was still to oppose the president's impeachment but that a meeting would be held before Saturday's vote to finalise plans.
The party boycotted the last vote, preventing a quorum. At least 200 votes are needed to impeach Yoon. Opposition parties have 192 seats, so they need at least eight PPP members to join.
As of Thursday, at least seven members of the party were expected to support a new impeachment motion.
One PPP lawmaker who said he would now vote to impeach Yoon said the president's new remarks may have rallied some loyalists but sowed more confusion and division among conservatives.
[[nid:712337]]
"His speech had an impact on the election of the floor leader. Also, it sounds like he urged those who blindly follow the president among conservatives to take action," PPP lawmaker Kim Sang-wook told reporters.
Kim said he felt frustrated and betrayed because the speech dashed his last hopes that Yoon would leave office in a "decent" way.
Public support for impeachment
Opinion polls show a majority of South Koreans support impeaching Yoon. A survey released by pollster Realmeter on Dec. 5 found 73.6 per cent of respondents supported impeachment, including 50.4 per cent of those who identified themselves as conservatives.
Yoon's speech lit up conservative political forums online, with the top-ranked posts titled "Martial law was the most reasonable decision", and "Han made a wrong decision".
After Yoon's speech, scuffles could be seen breaking out between attendees of a pro-conservative rally in central Seoul and an opposition supporter who removed a banner of support for Yoon's martial law declaration.
Kim Tae-hyun, who attended the rally, said he thought Yoon did a "good job" with his speech and had the right to declare martial law.
"And the impeachment just shouldn't happen... So (the martial law declaration) was merely an expression of the authority of the president," said Kim. "The Democratic Party, which is currently holding the country back, is the real issue."
[[nid:712404]]
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (46277)
Related
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Anthony Volpe knows these New York Yankees can do 'special things'
- Surfer Carissa Moore says she has no regrets about Olympic plan that ends without medal
- Brittney Griner on Paul Whelan, Evan Gershkovich being released: 'It's a great day'
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- Inside Robby Starbuck's anti-DEI war on Tractor Supply, John Deere and Harley-Davidson
- 'Bill & Ted' stars Keanu Reeves, Alex Winter to reunite in new Broadway play
- Flavor Flav, Alexis Ohanian step up to pay rent for US Olympian Veronica Fraley
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- Conn's HomePlus now closing all stores: See the full list of locations
Ranking
- 'Most Whopper
- Trump election subversion case returned to trial judge following Supreme Court opinion
- Florida-bound passengers evacuated at Ohio airport after crew reports plane has mechanical issue
- Léon Marchand completes his dominating run through the Paris Olympics, capturing 4th swimming gold
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Anthony Volpe knows these New York Yankees can do 'special things'
- Nebraska, Ohio State, Alabama raise NIL funds at football practice through fan admission, autographs
- After the end of Roe, a new beginning for maternity homes
Recommendation
Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
Authorities are investigating after a man died in police custody on Long Island
‘Taking it off the speculative market’: These nonprofits help tenants afford to stay put
2024 Olympics: Sha'Carri Richardson Makes Epic Comeback 3 Years After Suspension
At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
Tiffany Haddish Shares the NSFW Side Hustle She Used to Have Involving Halle Berry and Dirty Panties
Conn's HomePlus now closing all stores: See the full list of locations
New York politician convicted of corruption to be stripped of pension in first use of forfeiture law